Blog Archives
Morgage News Daily – Today’s News
Mortgage News Daily – Mortgage And Real Estate News
Related articles
- U.S. To Charge Four Ex-Traders With Fraud Related To Subprime Morgages (huffingtonpost.com)
- Fannie Mae CEO Steps Down (popiwinters.wordpress.com)
- Market Update January 2012 (besthouses2go.wordpress.com)
False Statements
False Statements
Action Date: June 27, 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
California Bankruptcy Judge Laura Stuart Taylor has joined the ranks of judges who will not tolerate fraudulent documents produced by banks to foreclose. Judge Taylor entered an Order To Show Cause why OneWest Bank, FSB, should not incur “a significant coercive sanction intended to deter any future tender of misleading evidence to any court of this district.” Judge Taylor ordered OneWest to appear before her on July 29, 2011, to show cause as to why it should not be subject to compensatory and/or coercive sanctions, in the case In re Jessie M. Arizmendi, Bk. No. 09-19263-PB13, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California. The case involves a motion for relief from stay filed by OneWest supported with a declaration of Brian Burnett, who declared under penalty of perjury that OneWest was the real party in interest in connection with the Motion because OneWest was the current beneficiary under the terms of a promissory note and Deed of Trust.
According to the Burnett declaration, OneWest received its interest in the Trust Deed pursuant to an Assignment from MERS. The assignment of the Trust Deed and the Note showed the transfer from MERS as nominee for the original lender directly to OneWest in 2010.
At trial, however, OneWest’s witness, Charles Boyle, testified that the beneficiary of the loan was actually Freddie Mac. Based on this conflict, the Court required post-trial briefings.
According to the Court, “OneWest, in its post-trial brief, provided a standing argument based on a new version of the Note, which attached an allonge dated July 24, 2007 evidencing a transfer from Original Lender to IndyMac Bank, FSB and bore an endorsement in blank from IndyMac Bank, FSB. This was new information not presented in the OneWest Declaration and this note was not identical to the note authenticated by the OneWest Declaration and attached to the OneWest Proof of Claim.
This Court is concerned, thus, that OneWest provided false or misleading evidence to the Court and that OneWest did so willfully, maliciously, in bad faith, and/or for an inappropriate purpose.”
According to research by Fraud Digest, Brian Burnett has used many different job titles when signing mortgage-related documents for OneWest, often using different titles on the same day, including:
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Acoustic Home Loans;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Aegis Wholesale Corporation;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for American Brokers Conduit;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Beach First National Bank;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Credit Suisse Financial Corp.;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for CTX Mortgage Company, LLC;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for DHI Mortgage Company, Ltd.;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Express Capital Lending;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Finasure Home Loans, LLC;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for First Magnus Financial Corporation;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for First Meridian Mortgage;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Flick Mortgage Investors, Inc.;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Home Loan Center, Inc. d/b/a LendingTree Loans;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Impac Funding Corp., d/b/a Impac Lending Group;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for IndyMac Bank, FSB;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for LoanCity;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for MortgageIt, Inc.;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for NetBank, a Federal Savings Bank;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for New American Funding, a California Corporation;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Opteum Financial Services, LLC;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for OneWest Bank, FSB;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Quicken Loans, Inc.;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Sloan Mortgage Group, Inc.;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Taylor, Bean & Whitaker;
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for TM Capital, Inc.
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for d/b/a Fedfirst Mortgage Corporation; and
- Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for UBS AG.
July 29, 2011, may be the day that Brian Burnett and OneWest are held accountable for the thousands of mortgage assignments – with false statements regarding the history and ownership of mortgages – presented to courts to foreclose.
SOURCE: Fraud Digest
I-Team: The Secret Truth About Foreclosures
86-year old Collis McDuffie chokes back tears when he thinks about losing the home that he bought back in 1963, to foreclosure.
“When you go through what I’m going through. Lord have mercy,” McDuffie said, as he questioned his future.
“At my age, where am I going to go?”
His daughter Zella is blunt.
“And this is where the banks are making money. They’re making money off of people. It doesn’t matter. Who cares if you’re living on the streets,” said Zella McDuffie-Smith.
Making money off of people? Big banks profiting from foreclosures? That news stunned many South Floridians who responded to questions from the CBS4 I-Team.
“I think it’s wrong,” said one man.
“Well, appalled of course,” was a woman’s reaction.
Another woman told us, “I think it’s disgraceful. That’s what I think.”
This shopper in South Dade was very pointed, “That’s criminal.”
In fact, it just might be criminal.
Fifty state attorneys general are currently investigating the foreclosure fiasco.
Legal Services of Greater Miami’s Jaqueline Ledon is helping Collis McDuffie, fight to keep his home.
“The practical thinking is, why would a bank want to own a property, maintain it, pay the taxes… all that,” said Ledon.
According to some critics, the practical or old way of thinking doesn’t hold up anymore. Why? It’s estimated that 95% of all mortgages are not even owned by the bank that loaned you the money. Most banks have sold them off.
In the most simplistic terms… banks bundled mortgages much like a gift is boxed, wrapped and tied up with a bow.
That way, they looked safe to conservative investors, such as the people who buy long-term investments for pension funds.
But when the housing market unraveled, much like a bow comes untied, it left the investors holding, in essence, a nicely wrapped empty box worth very little.
In many cases… nobody even knows who really owns the mortgages anymore.
“They’re worthless,” said Ledon. “They’re worthless. The mortgage itself is worthless.”
Since the bank that originally made the loan sold it off, foreclosure is not even a risk to them anymore, according to Weston attorney Roy Oppenheim.
“Typically the way the servicers were compensated, they would receive more compensation through a foreclosure than through a modification,” Oppenheim explained.
So what is a servicer? It’s a bank or financial company that handles your mortgage, doing such things as collecting your monthly payment.
As a servicer, they get to collect fees, fines and penalties. Servicers are also the first in line to collect even more money once a property is repossed.
“And therefore, it was in their interest to have the foreclosure go through the process versus a modification,” Oppenheim told CBS4′s Chief Consumer Investigator Al Sunshine.
Basically, you, the borrower are asking for a modification from the very same people who can make more money from your foreclosure, than if they offered you a cheaper, or modified mortgage, in order to keep you in your home.
Isn’t that an inherent conflict of interest?” Al Sunshine asked attorney Oppenheim.
“The whole process is wrought with conflicts of interest. It’s just a rotten bag of apples,” Oppenheim concluded.
Fund Legal Assistance for Homeowners Now!
“Are There Government Barriers to the Housing Market Recovery?” Is the title of the Testimony of Julia Gordon, Center for Responsible Lending, before members of congress February 16th 2011
Within this congressional testimony we find important recommendations the most critical in my opinion is…
“Level the playing field in court by funding legal assistance for homeowners.”
But if you wait for Congress to level the playing field it will already be too late. So please find an attorney willing to litigate the end game which includes the professional fees incurred to reach an agreement predicated on an affordable sustainable settlement for you, the at risk homeowner.
Here are some of the other recommendations that the Center for Responsible Lending made to congress and we should all consider…
- Mandate loss mitigation prior to foreclosure.
- In making changes that impact housing finance and mortgage origination going forward, consider the needs of first-time home buyers and customers from low wealth backgrounds who have the ability to repay safe and sustainable loans.
- Level the playing field in court by funding legal assistance for homeowners.
- Ensure that homeowners receiving mortgage debt forgiveness or modifications do not find their new financial security undermined by a burdensome tax bill.
- Change the bankruptcy code to permit modifications of mortgages on principal residences.
For deeper understanding of what this group is advocating please refer to the written testimony attached…
Gordon-HFS-Biggert-testimony-final
MainStreet Resolutions is collaborating with a trusted network of attorneys and real estate professionals dedicated to achieving the highest level of results possible for deserving at risk home owners. If you feel you are a legitimate victim please contact us to access the most expert help available.
TLA
Are you in default or foreclosure? If you suspect you have been the victim of Predatory Lending here in Florida, suspect you might be a victim of fraud, suspect the lender who provided your mortgage may have been less than honest, or may have even purposely overvalued your property in the Appraisal, please contact me, Tiffany Arthur at tiffanylarthur@aol.com or visit my website for more information at www.mainstreetresolutions.com We are interested in helping the homeowner find a permanent resolution to keep them in their home.
5 Elements of Foreclosure Defense
The key concept each of these items provide is leverage. All of the elements listed below may or may not be appropriate for any individual case. As long as an at risk homeowner has tried to do the right thing and been a victimized either by design, default, or circumstances legal defense is appropriate and right. That being said there are only a handful of attorneys and professionals that are using all of the weapons in a concerted stratagem.
- Counter Suites
- Fair Housing Complaints
- Professional Liability Errors and Omission claims
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Action
Smart home owners with smart lawyers using due diligence analytics and the will to litigate are going to make the banks pay one messy attempted foreclosure at a time. But act quickly and decisively because the banks you are defending yourself against have unlimited resources and access to the best analytics available to make it difficult. Use the Powel doctrine as a mantra, Paraphrased… Have a clear political objective; don’t be afraid to go in heavy handed, and don’t apologize for decisive action.
So, take a heavy handed bare fisted approach to bring the fight to the banks and don’t apologize. With the right leverage the Bank will beg you to take a reasonable offer when an impartial forensic analysis is over. MERS could very well be proven to have broken the chain of ownership improperly assigning the right to foreclose and removing the legal claim to property as collateral of the debt.
The objective is clear… An affordable payment based on your current income and the legal and professional fees required to confirm the figure has been negotiated fairly. Have the forensics analytics done to help define every element you can use as leverage.
TLA

